Belafonte Rosier v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
| ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| BELAFONTE LOPEZ ROSIER |
| 19-13198 |
| August 20, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Appellant Belafonte Lopez Rosier is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 8875730-2 ] [Entered: 09/10/2019 03:42 PM]
|
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to Appellant Belafonte Lopez Rosier's motion for voluntary dismissal, FRAP Rule 42 and 11th Cir. R. 42-1(a), the above referenced appeal was duly entered dismissed on this date [Entered: 09/10/2019 03:42 PM] |
| MOTION to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Appellant Belafonte Lopez Rosier. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8875730-1] [Entered: 09/10/2019 02:43 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Belafonte Lopez Rosier. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 09/04/2019 10:01 AM] |
| USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Belafonte Lopez Rosier was filed on 02/20/2019. Docket Entry 60. [Entered: 08/22/2019 09:52 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Belafonte Lopez Rosier on 08/19/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 08/22/2019 09:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
