In re: Todd Britton-Harr
| In re: TODD F. BRITTON-HARR |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-13950 |
| October 7, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by David L. Goldberg for USA [19-13950] (ECF: David Goldberg) [Entered: 10/11/2019 03:48 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. EMERGENCY Application for leave to file successive motion to vacate sentence filed by Petitioner Todd F. Britton-Harr. Served 10/03/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Required [Entered: 10/08/2019 02:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Todd Britton-Harr | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: TODD F. BRITTON-HARR | |
| Represented By: | Michael Robert Ufferman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Not yet classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | David Lance Goldberg |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Florida |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
