Gladys Chege v. Georgia Department of Juvenile
| GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE |
| GLADYS CHEGE |
| 19-14852 |
| December 3, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Gladys Chege v. Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Thomas Jarriel for Gladys Chege. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 01/14/2020 09:19 AM] |
| Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Gladys Chege. The appellant's brief is due on or before 02/19/2020. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 01/14/2020 09:17 AM] |
| Appellate fee was paid on 01/10/2020 as to Appellant Gladys Chege. [Entered: 01/14/2020 09:05 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Thomas F. Jarriel for Appellant. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-14852] (ECF: Thomas Jarriel) [Entered: 01/09/2020 10:10 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Thomas F. Jarriel for Appellant Gladys Chege. [19-14852] (ECF: Thomas Jarriel) [Entered: 01/09/2020 10:05 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Thomas F. Jarriel for Appellant Chege Gladys Chege. [19-14852] (ECF: Thomas Jarriel) [Entered: 01/09/2020 09:59 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Gladys Chege. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 12/31/2019 04:33 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Courtney C. Poole for Appellee Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-14852] (ECF: Courtney Poole) [Entered: 12/30/2019 01:19 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Courtney C. Poole for Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice. [19-14852] (ECF: Courtney Poole) [Entered: 12/16/2019 03:34 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Bryan K. Webb for Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice. [19-14852] (ECF: Bryan Webb) [Entered: 12/16/2019 04:37 PM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Gladys Chege on 12/02/2019. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: Motion for IFP. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 12/17/2019 as to Appellant Gladys Chege. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 12/31/2019 as to Appellee Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice [Entered: 12/12/2019 02:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
