Jason Sartori v. United States Army
| UNITED STATES ARMY |
| JASON SARTORI |
| 20-10141 |
| January 10, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Jason Sartori v. United States Army |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Jason Sartori. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9010016-1] [20-10141] (ECF: Michael Stanski) [Entered: 02/14/2020 12:30 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Kathryn W. Drey for United States Army, Marie Moyle for United States Army and U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Florida for United States Army. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/10/2020 08:30 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Kathryn W. Drey for Appellee United States Army. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-10141] (ECF: Kathryn Drey) [Entered: 02/10/2020 11:50 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Marie Moyle for Appellee United States Army. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-10141] (ECF: Marie Moyle) [Entered: 02/10/2020 02:55 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Kathryn Drey for Appellee [20-10141] (ECF: Kathryn Drey) [Entered: 02/05/2020 04:01 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Florida for United States Army. [20-10141] (ECF: Marie Moyle) [Entered: 02/03/2020 10:12 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Michael Stanski for Jason Sartori. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the Court's public web-page. Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 01/27/2020 08:19 AM] |
| Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 01/24/2020 09:46 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Michael Stanski for Jason Sartori. [20-10141] (ECF: Michael Stanski) [Entered: 01/16/2020 02:43 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Michael Stanski for Appellant Jason Sartori. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-10141] (ECF: Michael Stanski) [Entered: 01/16/2020 02:46 PM] |
| Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Michael Stanski for Appellant Jason Sartori. [20-10141] (ECF: Michael Stanski) [Entered: 01/16/2020 02:48 PM] |
| USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Jason Sartori was filed on 01/14/2020. Docket Entry 70. [Entered: 01/15/2020 07:49 AM] |
| USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant Jason Sartori was filed on 01/10/2020. Docket Entry 66. [Entered: 01/13/2020 10:13 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Jason Sartori on 01/10/2020. Fee Status: IFP Pending. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 01/24/2020 as to Appellant Jason Sartori. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/07/2020 as to Appellee United States Army [Entered: 01/13/2020 10:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jason Sartori v. United States Army | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY | |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Florida |
| Represented By: | Marie Moyle |
| Represented By: | Kathryn W. Drey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: JASON SARTORI | |
| Represented By: | Michael Stanski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
