Shane Whipple v. Michael Johnson, et al
| MICHAEL JOHNSON, K. ZEBLEY, L.P.N. psychological services, SERGEANT B. KOREY, Supervisor and JOSHUA ABERNATHY, Correctional Officer |
| SHANE Q. WHIPPLE |
| 20-10421 |
| January 30, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Shane Q. Whipple. [Entered: 03/16/2020 10:04 AM] |
| Notice of receipt: Jurisdictional Statement and Exhibits as to Appellant Shane Q. Whipple. [Entered: 03/12/2020 12:03 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Shane Q. Whipple. [Entered: 03/04/2020 03:43 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Shane Q. Whipple. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/20/2020 05:13 PM] |
| USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant Shane Q. Whipple was filed on 02/12/2020. Docket Entry 104. [Entered: 02/20/2020 05:12 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Shane Q. Whipple on 01/30/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.--[Edited 02/05/2020 by JFC to correct appellant's address] [Entered: 02/04/2020 09:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
