Peter Smith v. Walmart Stores, Inc., et al
WALMART STORES, INC. and WALMART |
PETER J. SMITH |
20-11953 |
May 26, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R. 42-2(c), this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Peter J. Smith has failed to file an appellant's brief within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 07/21/2020 04:50 PM] |
Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Peter J. Smith. [Entered: 06/29/2020 02:39 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Peter J. Smith. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 06/10/2020 04:21 PM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Peter J. Smith. [Entered: 06/11/2020 08:43 AM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Peter J. Smith. No hearings. [Entered: 06/11/2020 08:42 AM] |
CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Peter J. Smith on 05/25/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/09/2020 as to Appellant Peter J. Smith [Entered: 05/28/2020 09:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.