Mervat Guirguis v. United States Dept. of HUD
| MERVAT M. GUIRGUIS |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT |
| 20-12462 |
| June 29, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Petitioner Mervat M. Guirguis. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9128959-1] [Entered: 07/06/2020 11:08 AM] |
| AGENCY PETITION / APPLICATION DOCKETED. Filed by Petitioner Mervat M. Guirguis. Fee Status: IFP Pending. 06/25/2020. [Entered: 07/06/2020 11:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Mervat Guirguis v. United States Dept. of HUD | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: MERVAT M. GUIRGUIS | |
| Represented By: | Mervat M. Guirguis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | |
| Represented By: | Kiara Griggs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
