Waseem Daker v. Redfin Corporation Inc
REDFIN CORPORATION INC, a State of Washington corporation |
WASEEM DAKER |
20-13598 |
September 22, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Waseem Daker v. Redfin Corporation Inc. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Appellate fee was paid on 10/20/2020 as to Appellant Waseem Daker. [Entered: 10/27/2020 08:51 AM] |
Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Waseem Daker. The appellant's brief is due on or before 11/30/2020. [Entered: 10/27/2020 09:58 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons filed by Attorney Ned Blumenthal for Appellee Redfin Corporation Inc has been conditionally filed. Document may be clerically stricken and treated as though they were never filed if appearance of counsel has not been received within 21 days. [Entered: 10/25/2020 07:04 AM] |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Ned Blumenthal for Appellee Redfin Corporation Inc. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-13598] (ECF: Ned Blumenthal) [Entered: 10/23/2020 02:37 PM] |
Notice of Change of Address for Party Waseem Daker. [Entered: 10/23/2020 03:48 PM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Waseem Daker. [Entered: 10/23/2020 03:45 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Ned Blumenthal for Redfin Corporation Inc. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 10/21/2020 09:24 AM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Waseem Daker. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 10/07/2020 09:20 AM] |
PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Waseem Daker on 09/18/2020. Fee Status: PLRA 3 Strikes. [Entered: 09/28/2020 06:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Waseem Daker v. Redfin Corporation Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: REDFIN CORPORATION INC, a State of Washington corporation | |
Represented By: | Ned Blumenthal |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: WASEEM DAKER | |
Represented By: | Waseem Daker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.