Luxottica Group S.p.A., et al v. blingbling-eyes.com
| LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A., OAKLEY, INC. and COSTA DEL MAR, INC. |
| BLINGBLING-EYES.COM |
| 22-10205 |
| January 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Trademark |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by blingbling-eyes.com. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9616540-1] [22-10205] (ECF: James Gilmore) [Entered: 03/10/2022 11:10 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-10205] (ECF: James Gilmore) [Entered: 03/09/2022 12:13 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by [22-10205] (ECF: James Gilmore) [Entered: 03/09/2022 12:12 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney James Marshall Gilmore for Appellant blingbling-eyes.com. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [22-10205] (ECF: James Gilmore) [Entered: 03/09/2022 12:17 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney James Marshall Gilmore for Appellant blingbling-eyes.com. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [22-10205] (ECF: James Gilmore) [Entered: 03/09/2022 12:19 PM] |
| MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by blingbling-eyes.com. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9616099-1] [22-10205] (ECF: James Gilmore) [Entered: 03/09/2022 05:01 PM] |
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant blingbling-eyes.com failed to file a Transcript Order Form and file a Civil Appeal Statement form within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 03/08/2022 03:24 PM]
|
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to James Marshall Gilmore for blingbling-eyes.com and Ricco Carlos Washburn for blingbling-eyes.com. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 03/04/2022 12:05 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to James Marshall Gilmore for blingbling-eyes.com and Ricco Carlos Washburn for blingbling-eyes.com. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 02/17/2022 09:32 AM] |
| The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant blingbling-eyes.com. The appellant is hereby notified that upon expiration of 14 days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the default has been corrected. [Entered: 02/15/2022 01:37 PM] |
| Appellate fee was paid on 02/01/2022 as to Appellant blingbling-eyes.com. [Entered: 02/15/2022 01:31 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Stephen M. Gaffigan for Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc., and Costa Del Mar, Inc. Attorney Mr. Stephen M. Gaffigan for Appellees Costa Del Mar, Inc., Luxottica Group S.p.A. and OO. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-10205] (ECF: Stephen Gaffigan) [Entered: 02/15/2022 05:28 PM] |
| James Marshall Gilmore for Appellant blingbling-eyes.com and Ricco Carlos Washburn for Appellant blingbling-eyes.com has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required Civil Appeal Statement has been received. A motion to file the Civil Appeal Statement out of time should also be filed at this time. [Entered: 02/14/2022 03:04 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to James Marshall Gilmore for blingbling-eyes.com and Ricco Carlos Washburn for blingbling-eyes.com. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 02/02/2022 10:53 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Stephen M. Gaffigan for Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc., and Costa Del Mar, Inc. Mr. Stephen M. Gaffigan for Costa Del Mar, Inc., Luxottica Group S.p.A. and OO. [22-10205] (ECF: Stephen Gaffigan) [Entered: 02/01/2022 09:41 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant blingbling-eyes.com on 01/14/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/01/2022 as to Appellant blingbling-eyes.com. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 02/15/2022 as to Appellees [Entered: 01/27/2022 12:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
