In re: Darrell Williams
| In re: DARRELL WILLIAMS |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 22-11631 |
| May 13, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Alabama for USA. [22-11631] (ECF: Christopher Bodnar) [Entered: 05/16/2022 01:29 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. Petition for WRIT of MANDAMUS filed by Petitioner Darrell Williams. Served 05/06/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid [Entered: 05/16/2022 11:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Darrell Williams | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: DARRELL WILLIAMS | |
| Represented By: | Darrell Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Christopher John Bodnar |
| Represented By: | U.S. Attorney Service - Southern District of Alabama |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
