George Richard Mendoza v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
GEORGE RICHARD MENDOZA |
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, LLC |
22-11885 |
June 6, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Joseph H. Lang, Jr. for Appellee Keefe Commissary Network, LLC. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11885] (ECF: Joseph Lang) [Entered: 07/06/2022 04:21 PM] |
JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to George Richard Mendoza. [Entered: 07/06/2022 10:34 AM] |
Construed MOTION to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Appellant George Richard Mendoza. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9709724-1] [Entered: 07/08/2022 08:57 AM] |
No action will be taken on Motion for Leave to File Out of Time [ # 9707209-2 ]. The referenced filing by Appellant George Richard Mendoza *Motion to file out of time is unnecessary [Entered: 07/05/2022 04:27 PM] |
MOTION for leave to file IFP out of time filed by Appellant George Richard Mendoza. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9707209-1] [Entered: 07/05/2022 04:24 PM] |
MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant George Richard Mendoza. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9707190-1] [Entered: 07/05/2022 04:19 PM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant George Richard Mendoza. [Entered: 07/05/2022 04:14 PM] |
Notice of receipt: Letter as to Appellant George Richard Mendoza.. [Entered: 07/05/2022 04:15 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party George Richard Mendoza. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [Entered: 07/05/2022 04:16 PM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to George Richard Mendoza. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 06/23/2022 10:51 AM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Caycee Hampton for Keefe Commissary Network, LLC. [22-11885] (ECF: Caycee Hampton) [Entered: 06/21/2022 04:50 PM] |
APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Joseph H. Lang, Jr. for Keefe Commissary Network, LLC [22-11885] (ECF: Joseph Lang) [Entered: 06/21/2022 09:42 PM] |
No action will be taken on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 9691644-2 ]. The referenced filing by Appellant George Richard Mendoza is deficient for failure to comply with this court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. [Entered: 06/13/2022 11:39 AM] |
MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant George Richard Mendoza. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9691644-1] [Entered: 06/13/2022 11:38 AM] |
PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant George Richard Mendoza on 06/02/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 06/08/2022 04:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.