Bradley Rodriguez v. Social Security Administration
| BRADLEY JUDAS RODRIGUEZ |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 22-13602 |
| October 27, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Soc Security-HIA (1395 ff)/Medicare |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Rodriguez v. Social Security Administration
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Bradley Judas Rodriguez. The appellant's brief is due on or before 01/11/2023. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 12/07/2022 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 12 USDC order granting IFP as to Appellant Bradley Judas Rodriguez was filed on 12/02/2022. Docket Entry 60. [Entered: 12/06/2022 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Brian C. Huberty for Social Security Administration [22-13602] (ECF: Brian Huberty) [Entered: 12/05/2022 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Tyler Wetzel for Appellee Social Security Administration. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13602] (ECF: Tyler Wetzel) [Entered: 11/18/2022 12:32 PM] |
| Filing 9 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Daniel M. Lader for Appellant Bradley Judas Rodriguez. No hearings. [Entered: 11/09/2022 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Daniel M. Lader for Appellant Bradley Judas Rodriguez. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-13602] (ECF: Daniel Lader) [Entered: 11/09/2022 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Daniel M. Lader for Appellant Bradley Judas Rodriguez. No hearings. [22-13602] (ECF: Daniel Lader) [Entered: 11/09/2022 11:36 AM] |
| Filing 6 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Daniel M. Lader for Appellant Bradley Judas Rodriguez. [22-13602] (ECF: Daniel Lader) [Entered: 11/09/2022 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Daniel M. Lader for Bradley Judas Rodriguez. [22-13602] (ECF: Daniel Lader) [Entered: 11/09/2022 11:34 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Joseph A. DiRuzzo, III for Bradley Judas Rodriguez. [22-13602] (ECF: Joseph DiRuzzo) [Entered: 11/09/2022 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Timothy C. Stevens for SSA [22-13602] (ECF: Timothy Stevens) [Entered: 11/08/2022 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Tyler Wetzel for Social Security Administration [22-13602] (ECF: Tyler Wetzel) [Entered: 11/01/2022 08:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Bradley Judas Rodriguez on 10/27/2022. Fee Status: IFP Pending. USDC motion pending: Motion for leave to Appeal in forma pauperis, DE# 58. No hearings to be transcribed. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/10/2022 as to Appellant Bradley Judas Rodriguez. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/25/2022 as to Appellee Social Security Administration [Entered: 10/27/2022 12:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
