Donald Johnson v. United States Congress
Plaintiff / Appellant: FLOYD D. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES CONGRESS
Case Number: 23-10682
Filed: March 6, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2023 Filing 10 Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellant Floyd D. Johnson. [Entered: 04/21/2023 03:09 PM]
April 7, 2023 Filing 9 Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Floyd D. Johnson. [Entered: 04/11/2023 04:09 PM]
April 5, 2023 Filing 7 JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Floyd D. Johnson. [Entered: 04/05/2023 11:25 AM]
April 3, 2023 Filing 8 Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Floyd D. Johnson. [Entered: 04/05/2023 12:54 PM]
March 23, 2023 Filing 6 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Floyd D. Johnson. [Entered: 03/24/2023 09:32 AM]
March 22, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Floyd D. Johnson. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 03/22/2023 11:27 AM]
March 17, 2023 Filing 4 No action will be taken on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 3 ]. The referenced filing from Appellant Floyd D. Johnson is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements [Entered: 03/17/2023 12:19 PM]
March 16, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Floyd D. Johnson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [3] [Entered: 03/17/2023 12:19 PM]
March 9, 2023 Filing 2 Notice of receipt: Duplicate Notice of Appeal as to Appellant Floyd D. Johnson received on 3/2/2023. [Entered: 03/09/2023 10:48 AM]
March 6, 2023 Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Floyd D. Johnson on 02/28/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 03/07/2023 12:16 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Donald Johnson v. United States Congress
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: FLOYD D. JOHNSON
Represented By: Floyd D. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES CONGRESS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?