Michael Chapman v. Jefferson Dunn, et al
MICHAEL CHAPMAN |
JEFFERSON S. DUNN, RUTH NAGLICH, MARY COOKS, MICHELLE SAGERS COPELAND, CHARLIE T. WAUGH, CORIZON MEDICAL, TEHUM CARE SERVICES, INC. and COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
23-11132 |
April 6, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Michael Chapman. Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 16 ] and Motion for appointment of counsel [ # 16 ] are deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. [Entered: 05/16/2023 12:03 PM] |
Filing 15 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Michael Chapman. Motion to stay submitted consent form until a ruling on prior In Forma Pauperis has been decided [ # 13 ] is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. Additionally, a motion to proceed in forma pauperis is unnecessary for this appeal. [Entered: 05/16/2023 11:51 AM] |
Filing 12 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Philip Guy Piggott for Appellees Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, Mary Cooks, Michelle Sagers Copeland, Jefferson S. Dunn, Corizon Medical, Ruth Naglich, Tehum Care Services, Inc. and Charlie T. Waugh. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-11132] (ECF: Philip Piggott) [Entered: 05/15/2023 10:06 AM] |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Philip Guy Piggott for Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, Ruth Naglich, Jefferson S. Dunn, Mary Cooks, Michelle Sagers Copeland, Charlie T. Waugh, Corizon Medical and Tehum Care Services, Inc.. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 05/12/2023 05:04 PM] |
Filing 10 Construed MOTION for suggestion of bankruptcy filed by Appellee Corizon Medical. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [10] [Entered: 05/12/2023 04:59 PM] |
Filing 16 MOTION to proceed IFP, for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Michael Chapman. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [16] [Entered: 05/16/2023 12:00 PM] |
Filing 9 Appellee Corizon, LLC'S Notice of Filing Court Order Regarding Automatic Stay filed by Attorney Philip Guy Piggott for Appellees Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, Mary Cooks, Michelle Sagers Copeland, Jefferson S. Dunn, Corizon Medical, Ruth Naglich, Tehum Care Services, Inc. and Charlie T. Waugh. [23-11132] (ECF: Philip Piggott) [Entered: 05/11/2023 08:57 AM] |
Filing 14 Notice of receipt: Consent Form as to Appellant Michael Chapman. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN because the filing is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. [Entered: 05/16/2023 11:37 AM] |
Filing 13 MOTION to stay submitted consent form until a ruling on prior In Forma Pauperis has been decided filed by Appellant Michael Chapman. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [13] [Entered: 05/16/2023 11:31 AM] |
Filing 8 Response to Jurisdictional Question filed by Appellees Mary Cooks, Jefferson S. Dunn, Corizon Medical and Ruth Naglich [23-11132] (ECF: Philip Piggott) [Entered: 05/05/2023 01:00 PM] |
Filing 7 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Philip Guy Piggott for Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, Mary Cooks, Michelle Sagers Copeland, Jefferson S. Dunn, Corizon Medical, Ruth Naglich, Tehum Care Services, Inc. and Charlie T. Waugh. Related cases? No. [23-11132] (ECF: Philip Piggott) [Entered: 05/05/2023 12:26 PM] |
Filing 4 JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Michael Chapman and Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, Mary Cooks, Michelle Sagers Copeland, Jefferson S. Dunn, Corizon Medical, Ruth Naglich, Tehum Care Services, Inc. and Charlie T. Waugh. [Entered: 05/02/2023 10:23 AM] |
Filing 6 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Michael Chapman. [Entered: 05/02/2023 10:37 AM] |
Filing 5 Notice of receipt: Notice of Plaintiffs Compliance to File Initial Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement (CIP); request for CIP forms as to Appellant Michael Chapman.. [Entered: 05/02/2023 10:31 AM] |
Filing 3 USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 04/10/2023. Docket Entry #68. [Entered: 04/12/2023 04:02 PM] |
Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Michael Chapman on 04/06/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 04/11/2023 05:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.