Datum Software, Inc. v. Citizant, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant: DATUM SOFTWARE, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: CITIZANT, INC.
Case Number: 23-12538
Filed: August 4, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 8, 2024 Datum Software, Inc. v. Citizant, Inc.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2023 Filing 16 Notice to Counsel of Record. Counsel of Record must be logged in to CM/ECF and Pacer to access this document. This is the only notice you will receive regarding this matter. Please print a copy for your file. [Entered: 09/11/2023 03:48 PM]
September 1, 2023 Filing 15 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Justin Ferraro for Appellee Citizant, Inc.. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-12538] (ECF: Justin Ferraro) [Entered: 09/01/2023 12:22 PM]
August 24, 2023 Filing 13 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Datum Software, Inc.. [Entered: 08/24/2023 04:03 PM]
August 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Motion for Leave to Cure Deficiency Related to Certificate of Interested Persons filed by Appellant Datum Software, Inc. is GRANTED by clerk [ # 8 ]. [Entered: 08/24/2023 04:01 PM]
August 24, 2023 Filing 11 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Datum Software, Inc.. The appellant's brief is due on or before 09/13/2023. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [Entered: 08/24/2023 12:36 PM]
August 24, 2023 Filing 10 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney Micheal S. Jackson for Appellant Datum Software, Inc.. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [Entered: 08/24/2023 12:36 PM]
August 23, 2023 Filing 9 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney Micheal S. Jackson for Appellant Datum Software, Inc.. No transcript is required for appeal purposes. [23-12538] (ECF: Micheal Jackson) [Entered: 08/23/2023 05:43 PM]
August 23, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION Datum now seeks leave of Court to cure the deficiency by e-filing the Certificate of Interested Persons out of time. filed by Datum Software, Inc.. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [8] [23-12538] (ECF: Micheal Jackson) [Entered: 08/23/2023 05:39 PM]
August 23, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Micheal S. Jackson for Datum Software, Inc.. You have failed to complete the Web-Based CIP on the Court's website and have not filed the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 08/23/2023 11:44 AM]
August 21, 2023 Filing 14 Notice of receipt: Duplicate TOF filing as to Appellant Datum Software, Inc... [Entered: 08/24/2023 06:37 PM]
August 21, 2023 Filing 6 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Justin Ferraro for Citizant, Inc. Related cases? No. [23-12538] (ECF: Justin Ferraro) [Entered: 08/21/2023 02:56 PM]
August 18, 2023 Filing 5 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Tenley A. Carp for Citizant, Inc.. Related cases? No. [23-12538] (ECF: Tenley Carp) [Entered: 08/18/2023 01:08 PM]
August 18, 2023 Filing 4 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney Micheal S. Jackson for Appellant Datum Software, Inc.. Related cases? No. [23-12538] (ECF: Micheal Jackson) [Entered: 08/18/2023 12:07 PM]
August 18, 2023 Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Erin Winn for Citizant, Inc.. Related cases? No. [23-12538] (ECF: Erin Winn) [Entered: 08/18/2023 11:53 AM]
August 17, 2023 Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Related cases? No. [23-12538] (ECF: Micheal Jackson) [Entered: 08/17/2023 05:43 PM]
August 4, 2023 Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Datum Software, Inc. on 08/04/2023. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 08/21/2023 as to Appellant Datum Software, Inc.. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 09/05/2023 as to Appellee Citizant, Inc. [Entered: 08/07/2023 04:12 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Datum Software, Inc. v. Citizant, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DATUM SOFTWARE, INC.
Represented By: Micheal S. Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITIZANT, INC.
Represented By: Tenley A. Carp
Represented By: Jamie Helen Kidd Frawley
Represented By: Sara Lord
Represented By: James Randall McNeill
Represented By: Erin Winn
Represented By: Justin Ferraro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?