Jerry Scofield v. Warden, et al
| JERRY WAYNE SCOFIELD |
| COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFERSON S. DUNN, WARDEN and CHERYL PRICE |
| 24-12403 |
| July 26, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal construed from appellants consent form filed by Appellant Jerry Wayne Scofield. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [11] [Entered: 09/10/2024 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 10 Consent Form filed by Appellant Jerry Wayne Scofield. [Entered: 09/10/2024 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 9 The Transcript Order Form has been filed as to Appellant Jerry Wayne Scofield. However, there is no notation as to whether or not transcripts are being ordered. Please resubmit a Transcript Order Form. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant files a completed Transcript Order Form. [Entered: 09/04/2024 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 8 USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 08/19/2024. Docket Entry 92. [Entered: 08/19/2024 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 7 USDC Motion filed by appellant for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees or consent form. Filed on 08/12/2024. Docket Entry 89. [Entered: 08/19/2024 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Benjamin H. Albritton for Appellees Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, Jefferson S. Dunn, Cheryl Price and Warden. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-12403] (ECF: Benjamin Albritton) [Entered: 08/13/2024 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 5 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Jerry Wayne Scofield. [Entered: 08/13/2024 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Transcript Order Form has been filed as to Appellant Jerry Wayne Scofield. However, it is not filled out correctly. There is no notation made on the form to indicate whether transcripts are being ordered or not. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time.--[Edited 08/13/2024 by AJR] [Entered: 08/13/2024 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Benjamin H. Albritton for Warden; Jefferson S. Dunn; Cheryl Price; and, Commissioner of Alabama Department of Corrections Related cases? No. [24-12403] (ECF: Benjamin Albritton) [Entered: 07/29/2024 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 2 Substitute attorney: Attorneys Attorney General, State of Alabama, Attorney General, State of Alabama, Attorney General, State of Alabama and Attorney General, State of Alabama in 24-12403 substituted by Attorneys Steven Marshall, Steven Marshall, Steven Marshall and Steven Marshall in 24-12403 [Entered: 07/29/2024 10:17 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Jerry Wayne Scofield on 07/26/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 07/29/2024 10:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
