Eric Keeton v. Limestone CF Warden
| ERIC KEETON |
| LIMESTONE CF WARDEN |
| 24-12961 |
| September 12, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Eric Keeton failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements and file a Transcript Order Form within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 10/28/2024 02:10 PM]
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Eric Keeton. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 10/03/2024 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 6 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Eric Keeton. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 10/03/2024 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 4 USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Eric Keeton was filed on 10/02/2024. Docket Entry 24. [Entered: 10/02/2024 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 5 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion for In forma pauperis and Motion for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Eric Keeton. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The filing is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1.. [Entered: 10/02/2024 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant Eric Keeton was filed on 09/12/2024. Docket Entry 19. [Entered: 09/13/2024 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 2 USDC motion for certificate of appealability as to Appellant Eric Keeton was filed on 09/12/2024. Docket Entry 18. [Entered: 09/13/2024 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Eric Keeton on 09/12/2024 USDC motion pending: MOTION for Certificate of Appealability MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed on 09/12/2024. DE# 19. Fee Status: IFP Pending. [Entered: 09/13/2024 02:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Eric Keeton v. Limestone CF Warden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ERIC KEETON | |
| Represented By: | Eric Keeton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: LIMESTONE CF WARDEN | |
| Represented By: | Steven Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
