In re: Patrick Thomas
Petitioner: In re: PATRICK E. THOMAS
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Case Number: 24-13118
Filed: September 23, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Motion for leave to file successive petition for habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Patrick E. Thomas is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS UNNECESSARY. [ # 1 ] ELB, BL and FMH (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 10/03/2024 02:45 PM]
September 23, 2024 Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. EMERGENCY Application for leave to file successive petition for habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Patrick E. Thomas. Fee Status: Fee Not Required [Entered: 09/26/2024 10:56 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Patrick Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: PATRICK E. THOMAS
Represented By: Patrick E. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Represented By: Steven Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?