Masaguilar v. Bradt
| Orlando Masaguilar |
| Mark L. Bradt |
| 15-2681 |
| August 21, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 02/16/2016, disposing of the appeal to EDNY, ISSUED.[Mandate][1705031] [15-2681] [Entered: 02/16/2016 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 26 MOTION ORDER, denying motion for certificate of appealability [ # 8 ] filed by Appellant Orlando Masaguilar, and dismissing the appeal, by RR, RCW, CFD, FILED. [1666816][26] [15-2681] [Entered: 12/17/2015 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 25 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yana Segal, ASSIGNED.[1666809] [15-2681] [Entered: 12/17/2015 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 21 SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[1626072] [15-2681] [Entered: 10/22/2015 04:56 PM] |
| Filing 19 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Mark L. Bradt, FILED. Service date 10/06/2015 by US mail.[1613601] [15-2681] [Entered: 10/06/2015 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY, Andrea M. DiGregorio, [ # 14 ], in place of attorney Barbara Underwood, SUBSTITUTED.[1611637] [15-2681] [Entered: 10/02/2015 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Mark L. Bradt, FILED. Service date 10/02/2015 by US mail. [1611625] [15-2681] [Entered: 10/02/2015 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Orlando Masaguilar, FILED. Service date 09/17/2015 by US mail.[1608261] [15-2681] [Entered: 09/29/2015 08:09 AM] |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Orlando Masaguilar, FILED. Service date 09/03/2015 by US mail.[1599243] [15-2681] [Entered: 09/16/2015 09:05 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER, dated 09/14/2015, dismissing appeal by 10/5/2015 unless Appellant moves for certificate of appealability, copy to pro se Appellant with forms, FILED.[1597395] [15-2681] [Entered: 09/14/2015 12:30 PM]
|
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[1582709] [15-2681] [Entered: 08/24/2015 09:17 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[1582707] [15-2681] [Entered: 08/24/2015 09:16 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 08/04/2015, RECEIVED.[1582704] [15-2681] [Entered: 08/24/2015 09:16 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 08/04/2015, denying certificate of appealability, RECEIVED.[1582702] [15-2681] [Entered: 08/24/2015 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Orlando Masaguilar, FILED. [1582698] [15-2681] [Entered: 08/24/2015 09:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Masaguilar v. Bradt | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Orlando Masaguilar | |
| Represented By: | Orlando Masaguilar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Mark L. Bradt | |
| Represented By: | Andrea DiGregorio |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
