International Union of Operati v. FXCM Inc.
| Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago and International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 478 Pension Fund, Individually and on Behalf of All others Similarly Situated |
| Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago on Behalf of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago |
| FXCM Inc., Dror Niv and Robert Lande |
| 16-3775 |
| November 3, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| STATUTES-Secur Comm Exchange |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: International Union of Operati v. FXCM Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 478 Pension Fund, Individually and on Behalf of All others Similarly Situated | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago on Behalf of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago | |
| Represented By: | Beth A. Kaswan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: FXCM Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Israel Dahan |
| Represented By: | Paul R. Bessette |
| Represented By: | Michael Biles |
| Represented By: | Tyler Wayne Highful |
| Represented By: | Srimath Saliya Subasinghe |
| Represented By: | James Patrick Sullivan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: Dror Niv | |
| Represented By: | Israel Dahan |
| Represented By: | Paul R. Bessette |
| Represented By: | Michael Biles |
| Represented By: | Tyler Wayne Highful |
| Represented By: | Srimath Saliya Subasinghe |
| Represented By: | James Patrick Sullivan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: Robert Lande | |
| Represented By: | Israel Dahan |
| Represented By: | Paul R. Bessette |
| Represented By: | Michael Biles |
| Represented By: | Tyler Wayne Highful |
| Represented By: | Srimath Saliya Subasinghe |
| Represented By: | James Patrick Sullivan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
