Medrano Cruz v. Barr
Petitioner: Gendris Fernando De Jes Medrano Cruz, AKA Henry Medrano, AKA Hernando Crudeta, AKA Fernando Cruseta
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Case Number: 19-372
Filed: February 7, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER, dated 03/26/2019, dismissing appeal by 04/09/2019, unless Petitioner Gendris Fernando De Jes Medrano Cruz, submits the Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, FILED.[2525730] [19-372] [Entered: 03/26/2019 10:55 AM]
March 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER, dated 03/26/2019, dismissing appeal by 04/09/2019, unless Petitioner Gendris Fernando De Jes Medrano Cruz, submits form C-A, FILED.[2525721] [19-372] [Entered: 03/26/2019 10:51 AM]
March 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER, dated 03/26/2019, dismissing appeal by 04/09/2019, unless Petitioner Gendris Fernando De Jes Medrano Cruz, submits fee or moves for in forma pauperis, FILED.[2525716] [19-372] [Entered: 03/26/2019 10:47 AM]
March 1, 2019 Filing 11 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD ON APPEAL, FILED.[2508854] [19-372] [Entered: 03/01/2019 02:42 PM]
February 21, 2019 Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Andrew J. Oliveira, [ # 8 ], in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED.[2502231] [19-372] [Entered: 02/21/2019 02:59 PM]
February 21, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr, FILED. Service date 02/21/2019 by CM/ECF, US mail. [2501904] [19-372] [Entered: 02/21/2019 12:12 PM]
February 19, 2019 Filing 7 CAPTION, pursuant to FRAP 43(c)(2), AMENDED.[2499867] [19-372] [Entered: 02/19/2019 04:43 PM]
February 19, 2019 Filing 6 MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, RESPONDENT, replaced by William P. Barr, Respondent per FRAP 43 (c)(2), SUBSTITUTED.[2499858] [19-372] [Entered: 02/19/2019 04:41 PM]
February 13, 2019 Filing 4 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [2495632] [19-372] [Entered: 02/13/2019 10:15 AM]
February 7, 2019 Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 01/11/2019, RECEIVED.[2495617] [19-372] [Entered: 02/13/2019 10:10 AM]
February 7, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Gendris Fernando De Jes Medrano Cruz, FILED. [2495604] [19-372] [Entered: 02/13/2019 10:06 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Medrano Cruz v. Barr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Represented By: Andrew Jacob Oliveira
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gendris Fernando De Jes Medrano Cruz, AKA Henry Medrano, AKA Hernando Crudeta, AKA Fernando Cruseta
Represented By: Shauky Michael Musa-Obregon Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?