Williams v. Chappius
Eric T. Schneiderman and P. Chappius, Jr. |
Corey Williams |
19-484 |
February 26, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER, dated 04/04/2019, dismissing appeal by 04/25/2019, unless Appellant Corey Williams moves for a certificate of appealability, FILED.[2532645] [19-484] [Entered: 04/04/2019 11:09 AM] |
Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee P. Chappius, Jr. and Eric T. Schneiderman, FILED. Service date 03/28/2019 by US mail.[2527774] [19-484] [Entered: 03/28/2019 01:13 PM] |
Filing 7 NOTICE, to Appellee P. Chappius, Jr. and Eric T. Schneiderman, for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[2527543] [19-484] [Entered: 03/28/2019 11:00 AM] |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY, Paul B. Lyons, [ # 5 ], in place of attorney Barbara D. Underwood, SUBSTITUTED.[2512496] [19-484] [Entered: 03/07/2019 11:16 AM] |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee P. Chappius, Jr. and Eric T. Schneiderman, FILED. Service date 03/07/2019 by US mail. [2512383] [19-484] [Entered: 03/07/2019 10:30 AM] |
Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2505997] [19-484] [Entered: 02/27/2019 09:04 AM] |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2505994] [19-484] [Entered: 02/27/2019 09:00 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S JUDGMENT, dated 01/25/2019, RECEIVED.[2505993] [19-484] [Entered: 02/27/2019 09:00 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Corey Williams, FILED. [2505987] [19-484] [Entered: 02/27/2019 08:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.