Guaillas Vele v. Barr
| Moises Alfonso Guaillas Vele and Maria Del Carmen Tenesaca Tenesaca |
| William P. Barr, United States Attorney General |
| 20-3252 |
| September 21, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Anthony Cardozo Payne for William P. Barr, in case 20-3252, [ # 7 ], ADDED.[2940037] [20-3252] [Entered: 09/28/2020 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Joseph D. Hardy, [ # 6 ], in place of attorney Lisa Arnold, SUBSTITUTED.[2940034] [20-3252] [Entered: 09/28/2020 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr, FILED. Service date 09/28/2020 by CM/ECF. [2939949] [20-3252] [Entered: 09/28/2020 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr, FILED. Service date 09/28/2020 by CM/ECF. [2939935] [20-3252] [Entered: 09/28/2020 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [2938976] [20-3252] [Entered: 09/25/2020 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Moises Alfonso Guaillas Vele and Maria Del Carmen Tenesaca Tenesaca, USCA receipt # A02-81903-481, FILED.[2938972] [20-3252] [Entered: 09/25/2020 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 08/21/2020, RECEIVED.[2938970] [20-3252] [Entered: 09/25/2020 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Moises Alfonso Guaillas Vele and Maria Del Carmen Tenesaca Tenesaca, FILED. [2938949] [20-3252] [Entered: 09/25/2020 03:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
