United States of America v. Banks (Martinez)
| Jaime Gomez, Andres Peralta, AKA Andresito, Diego Mojica, AKA FNU LNU, AKA Jeni, Thomas Marmolejos, AKA Thomas Marmolejas, Robert Banks, AKA Gordo and Danny Mercedes |
| Johnny Martinez, AKA Raoul Batiste |
| United States of America |
| 21-1225 |
| May 7, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY, Marguerite B. Colson for United States of America, in case 21-1225, [ # 11 ], ADDED.[3097901] [21-1225] [Entered: 05/11/2021 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 05/11/2021 by US mail. [3097873] [21-1225] [Entered: 05/11/2021 11:32 AM] |
Filing 10
ORDER, dated 05/11/2021, directing Appellant Johnny Martinez to inform Court how he wishes to proceed with appeal within 21 days of the date of the order, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3097683] [21-1225] [Entered: 05/11/2021 09:48 AM]
|
| Filing 8 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3096145] [21-1225] [Entered: 05/07/2021 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/24/2021, RECEIVED.[3096133] [21-1225] [Entered: 05/07/2021 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 03/24/2021, RECEIVED.[3096108] [21-1225] [Entered: 05/07/2021 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Johnny Martinez, FILED. [3096100] [21-1225] [Entered: 05/07/2021 02:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
