Mayo v. New Britain
A..J. Perez and City of New Britain |
Carlos Burgos, Robert Stafford, Officer, Felix Perez, Thomas Steck, Jeanette V. Fernandez, Benjamin M. Murphy, Nathan Soucy, Detective, Alan C. Mason and Jeanette Portalatin, Deputy Chief |
Alfred P. Mayo |
21-460 |
February 25, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION, for permission to appeal [ # 16 ], [ # 17 ], on behalf of Appellant Alfred P. Mayo, FILED.[3051045] [21-460] [Entered: 03/08/2021 01:22 PM] |
Filing 22 CURED DEFECTIVE FORM D-P [ # 15 ], [ # 19 ], on behalf of Appellant Alfred P. Mayo, FILED.[3051041] [21-460] [Entered: 03/08/2021 01:22 PM] |
Filing 21 CURED DEFECTIVE ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM [ # 14 ], [ # 18 ], on behalf of Appellant Alfred P. Mayo, FILED.[3051038] [21-460] [Entered: 03/08/2021 01:21 PM] |
Filing 20 MOTION, for assignment of pro bono counsel, on behalf of Appellant Alfred P. Mayo, FILED. Service date 03/08/2021 by email.[3051035] [21-460] [Entered: 03/08/2021 01:20 PM] |
Filing 19 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Alfred P. Mayo, FILED. Service date 03/08/2021 by email.[3051029] [21-460] [Entered: 03/08/2021 01:17 PM] |
Filing 18 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Alfred P. Mayo, FILED. Service date 03/08/2021 by email.[3051024] [21-460] [Entered: 03/08/2021 01:15 PM] |
Filing 17 MOTION, for permission to appeal, on behalf of Appellant Alfred P. Mayo, FILED. Service date 03/08/2021 by email.[3051022] [21-460] [Entered: 03/08/2021 01:14 PM] |
Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, MOTION, for permission to appeal, [12], on behalf of Appellant Alfred P. Mayo, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3051002] [21-460] [Entered: 03/08/2021 01:00 PM] |
Filing 15 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, FORM D-P, [11], on behalf of Appellant Alfred P. Mayo, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3050995] [21-460] [Entered: 03/08/2021 12:54 PM] |
Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, [10], on behalf of Appellant Alfred P. Mayo, FILED.[3050984] [21-460] [Entered: 03/08/2021 12:50 PM] |
Filing 13 LETTER, dated 03/02/2021, on behalf of Appellant Alfred P. Mayo, informing the Court in regards to the lawsuit agaisnt Hartford Lodging LLC., RECEIVED. Service date 03/02/2021 by US mail.[3050981] [21-460] [Entered: 03/08/2021 12:48 PM] |
Filing 12 MOTION, for permission to appeal, on behalf of Appellant Alfred P. Mayo, FILED. Service date 03/01/2021 by US mail.[3050962] [21-460] [Entered: 03/08/2021 12:37 PM] |
Filing 11 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Alfred P. Mayo, FILED. No Service.[3050956] [21-460] [Entered: 03/08/2021 12:34 PM] |
Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Alfred P. Mayo, FILED. No Service.[3050952] [21-460] [Entered: 03/08/2021 12:32 PM] |
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Carlos Burgos, Jeanette V. Fernandez, Alan C. Mason, Benjamin M. Murphy, Felix Perez, Jeanette Portalatin, Nathan Soucy, Robert Stafford and Thomas Steck, FILED. Service date 02/26/2021 by CM/ECF, email.[3045094] [21-460] [Entered: 02/26/2021 10:29 AM] |
Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3045025] [21-460] [Entered: 02/26/2021 09:47 AM] |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3045011] [21-460] [Entered: 02/26/2021 09:41 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, dated 02/22/2021, RECEIVED.[3045001] [21-460] [Entered: 02/26/2021 09:38 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Alfred P. Mayo, FILED. [3044995] [21-460] [Entered: 02/26/2021 09:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.