In re: New York City Board of
Mayling Ralph, Elsa Gulino, Peter Wilds and Nia Greene, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated |
New York State Education Department |
Mukti Chacon |
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York |
21-736 |
March 25, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, district court receipt # 465401278794, FILED.[3094466] [21-736] [Entered: 05/06/2021 07:30 AM] |
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Mukti Chacon, FILED. Service date 04/06/2021 by CM/ECF.[3071512] [21-736] [Entered: 04/06/2021 12:53 PM] |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY, Kevin Osowski, [ # 4 ], in place of attorney James E. Johnson, SUBSTITUTED.[3069293] [21-736] [Entered: 04/02/2021 12:41 PM] |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3069107] [21-736] [Entered: 04/02/2021 10:37 AM] |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, FILED. Service date 04/01/2021 by CM/ECF. [3068759] [21-736] [Entered: 04/01/2021 04:41 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 02/19/2021, RECEIVED.[3065612] [21-736] [Entered: 03/29/2021 01:34 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, FILED. [3065595] [21-736] [Entered: 03/29/2021 01:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.