Young v. Monroe County
| Jennifer Farina, Monroe County Jail Lieutenant |
| James Oliver Young |
| Monroe County, (Municipality), Sheriff Todd Baxter, Under Sheriff Korey Brown, Monroe County Jail Superintendent Matthew VanDuzee, Captains John Doe 1, Majors John Doe 2, Lieutenants John Doe 3, Sergeants John Doe 4, Corporals John Doe 5, Deputies John Doe 6, Mailroom Staff John Doe 7 and Jail Attorney Kim Hinckley |
| 22-1235 |
| June 3, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 CURED DEFECTIVE LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION [ # 17 ], [ # 25 ], on behalf of Appellant James Oliver Young, FILED.[3345237] [22-1235] [Entered: 07/11/2022 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 26 PAPERS, declaration of inmate filing and district court notification of default judgment denial, RECEIVED.[3345233] [22-1235] [Entered: 07/11/2022 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 25 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant James Oliver Young, informing Court of proposed due date 07/28/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 06/13/2022 by US mail.[3345228] [22-1235] [Entered: 07/11/2022 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 22 BRIEF, on behalf of Appellant James Oliver Young, FILED. Service date 07/01/2022 by US mail. [3343090] [22-1235] [Entered: 07/07/2022 08:11 AM] |
| Filing 17 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, LR 31.2 Scheduling Notification, [9], on behalf of Appellant James Oliver Young, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3336131] [22-1235] [Entered: 06/22/2022 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 14 CERTIFIED PRISONER AUTHORIZATION FORM, dated 06/22/2022, to Western District of New York - Rochester, ISSUED.[3336117] [22-1235] [Entered: 06/22/2022 10:13 AM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Todd Baxter, Matthew VanDuzee, Korey Brown, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6, John Doe 7, Kim Hinckley and Monroe County, FILED. Service date 06/21/2022 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3335407] [22-1235] [Entered: 06/21/2022 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 13 PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT AUTHORIZATION FORM, FILED. Service date 06/13/2022 by US mail.[3336076] [22-1235] [Entered: 06/22/2022 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, to reverse judgment, for award, on behalf of Appellant James Oliver Young, FILED. Service date 06/13/2022 by US mail.[3336064] [22-1235] [Entered: 06/22/2022 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 11 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant James Oliver Young, FILED. Service date 06/13/2022 by US mail.[3336061] [22-1235] [Entered: 06/22/2022 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Appellant James Oliver Young, FILED. Service date 06/13/2022 by US mail.[3336054] [22-1235] [Entered: 06/22/2022 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 9 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant James Oliver Young, informing Court of proposed due date no date, RECEIVED. Service date 06/13/2022 by US mail.[3336050] [22-1235] [Entered: 06/22/2022 09:44 AM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3328191] [22-1235] [Entered: 06/07/2022 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 5 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[3328188] [22-1235] [Entered: 06/07/2022 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3328180] [22-1235] [Entered: 06/07/2022 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER entered in the district court as docket entry dated 05/24/2022, RECEIVED.[3328173] [22-1235] [Entered: 06/07/2022 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant James Oliver Young, FILED. [3328170] [22-1235] [Entered: 06/07/2022 01:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
