Varecka v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
| John Varecka, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| CSX Transportation, Inc. |
| 22-2888 |
| November 3, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 12/12/2022, determining the appeal to WDNY, ISSUED.[Mandate][3468057] [22-2888] [Entered: 02/13/2023 11:17 AM] |
Filing 17
ORDER, [ # 8 ] appeal dismissed for Appellant John Varecka failure to file Form C, EFFECTIVE. [3456944] [22-2888] [Entered: 01/23/2023 02:39 PM]
|
| Filing 16 NEW CASE MANAGER, Atasha Joseph, ASSIGNED.[3456935] [22-2888] [Entered: 01/23/2023 02:27 PM] |
| Filing 12 INDEX/ROA NOTICE, to Appellant John Varecka, past due material(s) to be submitted by 12/22/2022, SENT.[3434811] [22-2888] [Entered: 12/12/2022 10:14 AM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER, dated 12/12/2022, dismissing appeal by 12/27/2022, unless Appellant John Varecka, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, FILED.[3434802] [22-2888] [Entered: 12/12/2022 10:08 AM]
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE, to Appellee CSX Transportation, Inc. , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3434784] [22-2888] [Entered: 12/12/2022 09:58 AM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER, dated 12/12/2022, dismissing appeal by 12/27/2022, unless Appellant John Varecka, submits Form D, FILED.[3434776] [22-2888]--[Edited 01/23/2023 by TT] [Entered: 12/12/2022 09:53 AM]
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER, dated 12/12/2022, dismissing appeal by 12/27/2022, unless Appellant John Varecka, submits Form C, FILED.[3434767] [22-2888] [Entered: 12/12/2022 09:45 AM]
|
| Filing 5 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Attorney Nicholas D. Thompson, Esq. for Appellant John Varecka, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED.[3416703] [22-2888] [Entered: 11/09/2022 08:30 AM] |
| Filing 4 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 10/03/2022, RECEIVED.[3416700] [22-2888] [Entered: 11/09/2022 08:29 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 9), dated 05/31/2022, RECEIVED.[3416699] [22-2888] [Entered: 11/09/2022 08:28 AM] |
| Filing 2 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant John Varecka, district court receipt # ANYWDC-4714817, FILED.[3416697] [22-2888] [Entered: 11/09/2022 08:26 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant John Varecka, FILED. [3416694] [22-2888] [Entered: 11/09/2022 08:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Varecka v. CSX Transportation, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: John Varecka, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas D. Thompson Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CSX Transportation, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Susan C. Roney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
