Food & Water Watch v. Environmental Protection Agency
| Food & Water Watch, Recirculating Farms Coalition, Center for Food Safety, Sierra Club, Healthy Gulf, Suncoast Waterkeeper and Tampa Bay Waterkeeper |
| United States Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Appeals Board |
| 22-2957 |
| November 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Attorney Elizabeth Leigh Lewis for Petitioner Sierra Club, Center for Food Safety, Food & Water Watch, Recirculating Farms Coalition, Healthy Gulf, Suncoast Waterkeeper and Tampa Bay Waterkeeper, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED.[3422949] [22-2957] [Entered: 11/18/2022 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [3422815] [22-2957] [Entered: 11/18/2022 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 4 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 06/08/2022, RECEIVED.[3422805] [22-2957] [Entered: 11/18/2022 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 3 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 05/06/2022, RECEIVED.[3422804] [22-2957] [Entered: 11/18/2022 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 09/30/2020, RECEIVED.[3422803] [22-2957] [Entered: 11/18/2022 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioners Center for Food Safety, Food & Water Watch, Healthy Gulf, Recirculating Farms Coalition, Sierra Club, Suncoast Waterkeeper and Tampa Bay Waterkeeper, FILED. [3422780] [22-2957] [Entered: 11/18/2022 02:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
