Lu v. Phillips
| Yang-Hao Lu, AKA Yaeng Hao Lu |
| William Phillips, Superintendent |
| 23-403 |
| March 22, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
ORDER, dated 05/17/2023, stating this appeal may be subject to dismissal by 06/07/2023, unless Appellant Yang-Hao Lu, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3517507] [23-403] [Entered: 05/17/2023 08:35 PM]
|
| Filing 24 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Yang-Hao Lu, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, [12], from the docket, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3517506] [23-403] [Entered: 05/17/2023 08:30 PM] |
| Filing 21 CURED DEFECTIVE FORM D-P, [ # 20 ], on behalf of Appellant Yang-Hao Lu, FILED.[3505090] [23-403] [Entered: 04/25/2023 07:44 PM] |
| Filing 20 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Yang-Hao Lu, FILED. Service date 04/21/2023 by US mail.[3505089] [23-403] [Entered: 04/25/2023 07:44 PM] |
| Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, [13], on behalf of Appellant Yang-Hao Lu, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3498371] [23-403] [Entered: 04/12/2023 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 15 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, [12], on behalf of Appellant Yang-Hao Lu, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3498352] [23-403] [Entered: 04/12/2023 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 13 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Yang-Hao Lu, FILED. Service date 04/05/2023 by US mail.[3498344] [23-403] [Entered: 04/12/2023 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Yang-Hao Lu, FILED. Service date 04/05/2023 by US mail.[3498341] [23-403] [Entered: 04/12/2023 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Yang-Hao Lu, FILED. Service date 04/05/2023 by US mail.[3498333] [23-403] [Entered: 04/12/2023 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE, to Appellee William Phillips, for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3497052] [23-403] [Entered: 04/10/2023 09:20 PM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3488580] [23-403] [Entered: 03/23/2023 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3488579] [23-403] [Entered: 03/23/2023 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/10/2023, RECEIVED.[3488574] [23-403] [Entered: 03/23/2023 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM DECISION, dated 03/08/2023, RECEIVED.[3488565] [23-403] [Entered: 03/23/2023 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Yang-Hao Lu, FILED. [3488557] [23-403] [Entered: 03/23/2023 03:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lu v. Phillips | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Yang-Hao Lu, AKA Yaeng Hao Lu | |
| Represented By: | Yang-Hao Lu |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: William Phillips, Superintendent | |
| Represented By: | Eric Gonzalez Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
