Boyd v. Sticht
Petitioner: DARRELL BOYD
Respondent: THOMAS STICHT, Superintendent
Case Number: 24-1570
Filed: June 12, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2024 Filing 3 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 06/12/2024 08:43 AM]
June 12, 2024 Filing 2 APPLICATION, for Second or Successive habeas petition, on behalf of Petitioner Darrell Boyd, OPENED. Notice to Petitioner Darrell Boyd, requiring filing of application form for second or successive petition, SENT. [Entered: 06/12/2024 08:38 AM]
June 12, 2024 Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE APPLICATION FOR HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF, transferred from U.S. District Court, on behalf of Petitioner Darrell Boyd, FILED. [Entered: 06/12/2024 08:30 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Boyd v. Sticht
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DARRELL BOYD
Represented By: Darrell Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THOMAS STICHT, Superintendent
Represented By: Barbara D. Underwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?