Abadi v. Adams
| AARON ABADI |
| ERIC ADAMS, in his personal capacity, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, BILL DE BLASIO, in his personal capacity, NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE, DAVID CHOKSHI, in his personal capacity, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, ROCHELLE PAULA WALENSKY, in her personal capacity, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH, ANTHONY STEPHEN FAUCI, in his personal capacity, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, PFIZER INC., MODERNA, INC., ECO HEALTH ALLIANCE, X CORP., formerly known as Twitter, Inc., ALPHABET INC. and META PLATFORMS, INC. |
| 24-1608 |
| June 17, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE, to World Health Organization, Pfizer Inc., Moderna, Inc., Eco Health Alliance, X Corp., Alphabet Inc., regarding a corporation proceeding Pro Se, and requesting a response 30 days from the date of this letter, SENT. [Entered: 06/17/2024 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 06/17/2024 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 5 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Aaron Abadi, received on 06/10/24, OPENED. [Entered: 06/17/2024 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 06/17/2024 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 05/28/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 06/17/2024 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 05/28/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 06/17/2024 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Aaron Abadi, FILED. [Entered: 06/17/2024 11:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
