Jean Denis v. Atty Gen USA
Petitioner: JEAN ANTOINE DENIS
Respondent: ATTY GEN USA
Case Number: 10-1390
Filed: February 18, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 3010315035 CLERK'S LETTER to counsel written at the direction of the Court. At the direction of the Court, counsel in the above matter (which is scheduled for argument on Tuesday, October 26, 2010) should be prepared to address the relevance, if any, of Scheidemann v. INS, 83 F.3d 1517 (3d Cir. 1996), and INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 (2001), on the retroactivity issue that has been raised in the briefs. (Please see the attached document.) [10-1390, 09-2113, 09-3520, 10-1391]--[Edited 10/14/2010 by TLW]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jean Denis v. Atty Gen USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JEAN ANTOINE DENIS
Represented By: Bryan L. Bloom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTY GEN USA
Represented By: Eric H. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?