Gary Savidge v. US Postmaster General, et al

Plaintiff - Appellant: GARY E. SAVIDGE
Defendant - Appellee: POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Case Number: 13-1572
Filed: March 5, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Americans w/Disabilities Act-Empl

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
February 21, 2014 Gary Savidge v. US Postmaster General

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 21, 2014 3011538334 Opinion or Order of the Court NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: GREENAWAY JR., GARTH and ROTH, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 8. Judge: ROTH Authoring.
Search for this case: Gary Savidge v. US Postmaster General, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: GARY E. SAVIDGE
Represented By: Cynthia L. Pollic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Represented By: Melissa A. Swauger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Represented By: Melissa A. Swauger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.