David Ochner v. Craig Stedman, et al

Defendant - Appellee: DETECTIVE STEPHEN OWENS, GOLDEN RECOVERY SERVICES, INC, LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, MICHAEL HORAN, JOHN NICODEM, BRIAN E. CHUDZIK, Asst. District Attorney, CRAIG STEDMAN and DETECTIVE HALSTEAD
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID OCHNER
Case Number: 13-2034
Filed: April 17, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
July 10, 2014 David Ochner v. Craig Stedman

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 10, 2014 3011675798 Opinion or Order of the Court NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: RENDELL, CHAGARES and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 11. Judge: JORDAN Authoring.
Search for this case: David Ochner v. Craig Stedman, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: DETECTIVE STEPHEN OWENS
Represented By: Christine E. Munion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: GOLDEN RECOVERY SERVICES, INC
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE
Represented By: Christine E. Munion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MICHAEL HORAN
Represented By: John G. Dean
Represented By: Joseph J. Joyce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: JOHN NICODEM
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: BRIAN E. CHUDZIK, Asst. District Attorney
Represented By: Genelle Franklin
Represented By: John P. Gonzales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CRAIG STEDMAN
Represented By: Genelle Franklin
Represented By: John P. Gonzales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: DETECTIVE HALSTEAD
Represented By: Christine E. Munion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: DAVID OCHNER
Represented By: Daniel J. Mazaheri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.