Sheldon Stephens v. Kevin Clash
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHELDON STEPHENS
Defendant - Appellee: KEVIN CLASH
Case Number: 14-3337
Filed: August 8, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 5, 2015 Summary Stephens v. Clash

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3012036495 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: SMITH, JORDAN and SLOVITER, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 23. Judge: SMITH Authoring, Judge: JORDAN Concurring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sheldon Stephens v. Kevin Clash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: SHELDON STEPHENS
Represented By: Stuart S. Mermelstein
Represented By: Daniel J. Tann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: KEVIN CLASH
Represented By: Michael G. Berger
Represented By: Christopher S. Lucas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?