In re: Lipitor Antitrust Lit
| RITE AID CORP, RITE AID HDQTRS CORP, MAXI DRUG INC, ECKERD CORP and JCG (PJC) USA LLC |
| PFIZER INC, PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS, WARNER LAMBERT CO, WARNER LAMBERT CO LLC, RANBAXY INC, RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD and RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS INC |
| 14-4202 |
| October 24, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Antitrust |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 In re: Lipitor Antitrust Litigation
|
|
In re: Lipitor Antitrust Lit v.
|
|
In re: Lipitor Antitrust Litigation
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3012706073
PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: SMITH, Chief Judge, AMBRO and FISHER, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 106. Judge: SMITH Authoring. [14-4202, 14-4203, 14-4204, 14-4205, 14-4206, 14-4602, 15-1184, 15-1185, 15-1186, 15-1187, 15-1274, 15-1323, 15-1342]
|
|
Filing
3012598145
ORDER AMENDING OPINION (Clerk), filed. [14-4202, 14-4203, 14-4204, 14-4205, 14-4206, 14-4602, 14-4632, 15-1184, 15-1185, 15-1186, 15-1187, 15-1274, 15-1323, 15-1342]
|
|
Filing
3012592318
PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: AMBRO, *SMITH and **FISHER, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 51. Authoring Judge: FISHER [14-4202, 14-4203, 14-4204, 14-4205, 14-4206, 14-4602, 14-4632, 15-1184, 15-1185, 15-1186, 15-1187, 15-1274, 15-1323, 15-1342] *(Honorable D. Brooks Smith, United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, assumed Chief Judge status on October 1, 2016) **(Honorable D. Michael Fisher, United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, assumed senior status on February 1, 2017)
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
