Tarun Patel v. Attorney General United State
Petitioner: TARUN PATEL
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 16-1041
Filed: January 8, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 9, 2017 Tarun Patel v. Attorney General United State

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3012506002 NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: MCKEE*, Chief Judge, HARDIMAN and RENDELL, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 5. Judge: MCKEE Authoring. (*Judge McKee concluded his term as Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals on September 30, 2016.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Tarun Patel v. Attorney General United State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: TARUN PATEL
Represented By: Frank B. Lindner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Thomas W. Hussey
Represented By: Loretta Lynch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?