USA v. Nicholas Stanishia
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: NICHOLAS STANISHIA
Case Number: 16-1239
Filed: February 3, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 25, 2017 USA v. Nicholas Stanishia

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3012603917 NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: HARDIMAN, SCIRICA, Circuit Judges and ROSENTHAL*, District Judge. Total Pages: 6. Judge: SCIRICA Authoring. *The Honorable Lee H. Rosethal, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Nicholas Stanishia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Daryl F. Bloom
Represented By: Kate L. Mershimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: NICHOLAS STANISHIA
Represented By: Thomas A. Thornton
Represented By: Frederick W. Ulrich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?