Roman Moldavchuk v. Attorney General United State
Petitioner: ROMAN MOLDAVCHUK
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 17-1175
Filed: January 20, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 4, 2017 Roman Moldavchuk v. Attorney General United States

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3012793058 NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: SHWARTZ, ROTH, Circuit Judges, and PAPPERT*, District Judge. Total Pages: 11. Judge: SHWARTZ Authoring. *Honorable Gerald J. Pappert, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pensylvania, sitting by designation.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Roman Moldavchuk v. Attorney General United State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ROMAN MOLDAVCHUK
Represented By: Tatiana S. Aristova
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Thomas W. Hussey
Represented By: Loretta Lynch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?