Edward Wehrenberg v. Metropolitan Property & Casual
Plaintiff - Appellant: EDWARD WEHRENBERG
Defendant - Appellee: METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO
Case Number: 17-1327
Filed: February 14, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Insurance

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 15, 2017 Edward Wehrenberg v. Metropolitan Property & Casual

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3012778446 NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: AMBRO, KRAUSE and RENDELL, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 8. Judge: KRAUSE Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Edward Wehrenberg v. Metropolitan Property & Casual
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: EDWARD WEHRENBERG
Represented By: Edward Wehrenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO
Represented By: Danielle M. Vugrinovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?