Luis Builes v. Warden Moshannon Valley Correc
Plaintiff - Appellant: LUIS BUILES
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Case Number: 17-2639
Filed: August 2, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 7, 2017 Luis Builes v. Warden Moshannon Valley Correc

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3012772524 NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION, granting Appellee's motion to summarily affirm the judgment of the District Court. See 3d Cir. LAR 27.4; I.O.P. 10.6. Coram: AMBRO, RESTREPO and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 6. BLD-038
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Luis Builes v. Warden Moshannon Valley Correc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: LUIS BUILES
Represented By: Luis Builes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: WARDEN MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Represented By: Rebecca R. Haywood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?