In re: Secretary Pennsylvania Departm
Petitioner: In re: SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Respondent: MELISSA SARVEY
Nominal Respondent: SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER
Case Number: 17-3024
Filed: September 18, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Secretary Pennsylvania Departm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Vincent R. Mazeski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MELISSA SARVEY
Represented By: Alexandra Morgan-Kurtz
Represented By: David R. Osipovich
Represented By: Anna Shabalov
Represented By: Ralph C. Surman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Nominal respondent: SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?