In re: Lewis Jordan
Not Yet Classified: MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, In re: LEWIS JORDAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 19-9001
Filed: May 15, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2019 CLERK ORDER dismissing case, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3(a) and LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1(a), for failure to pay the filing fee for the petition. Case terminated on 06/18/2019. (NR) [Entered: 06/18/2019 09:13 AM]
May 15, 2019 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner Lewis Jordan. Action on the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby deferred. Petitioner did not submit the filing fee or a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with the mandamus petition. Within 14 days of the date of this order, Petitioner must either file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit or remit payment of the $500.00 filing fee. The motion must be accompanied by a certified statement of Petitioner's institutional account. A certificate of service reflecting that the petition and motion have been served must be submitted to the Court of Appeals within 14 days of the date of this Order. It is noted that on May 1, 2019, the District Court dismissed Petitioner's habeas petition docketed at E.D. Pa. No. 2-19-cv-00086. After Petitioner has filed the documents in this Court required for the mandamus petition to be deemed compliant, Petitioner must file a response within 10 days addressing whether the mandamus petition should be dismissed as moot in light of the District Court's May 1, 2019 order. (CJG) [Entered: 05/15/2019 09:29 AM]
May 15, 2019 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner Lewis Jordan. (CJG) [Entered: 05/15/2019 09:22 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Lewis Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Ronald Eisenberg Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Represented By: Max C. Kaufman Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: In re: LEWIS JORDAN
Represented By: Lewis Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By: Ronald Eisenberg Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?