Rudy Davis v. Superintendent Fayette SCI, et al
| DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA |
| RUDY DAVIS |
| 20-2403 |
| July 8, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Rudy Davis. (MB) [Entered: 08/13/2020 09:41 AM]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Rudy Davis to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 08/06/2020. Certificate of Service dated 07/23/2020. Service made by US mail. (MB) [Entered: 08/10/2020 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Rusheen R. Pettit on behalf of Appellee(s) CW of PA, Allegheny County District Attorney Office, PA Attorney General Office. [20-2403] (RRP) [Entered: 07/27/2020 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 4 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Ronald Eisenberg, Esq. for Attorney General Pennsylvania and Rusheen R. Pettit, Esq. for Attorney General Pennsylvania, District Attorney Allegheny County and Superintendent Fayette SCI requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 08/06/2020. (MB) [Entered: 07/23/2020 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect AND for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (MW) [Entered: 07/13/2020 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (MB) [Entered: 07/08/2020 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Rudy Davis in District Court No. 2-17-cv-01152. (MB) [Entered: 07/08/2020 10:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
