4431 Inc, et al v. Cincinnati Insurance Companies, et al
CINCINNATI INDEMNITY CO, CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANIES, CINCINNATI CASUALTY CO and CINCINNATI INSURANCE CO |
4431 INC |
20-3594 |
December 23, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER (Clerk) In eight of these appeals, the appellants have jointly moved to consolidate the appeals. The appellees participating in those eight cases have all moved for an extension of time to respond to the consolidation motion. A ninth appeal (No. 20-3501) appears to raise similar issues but was not included in the consolidation motion. The Court will nevertheless sua sponte consider consolidating that appeal with the others. Although the consolidation motion appears to seek consolidation for the limited purposes of sheduling and disposition, that does not prevent the Court from consolidating for additional purposes (e.g. joint briefing) if appropriate. Any party who objects to consolidation must flie a response within fourteen days of this order. To that extent, the appellees' extension motions are granted. Similarly situated parties are stongly encouraged to file joint responses. The previously issued briefing schedule in No. 20-3124 is vacated, and therefore no action will be taken on those appellant's' extension motion. Briefing will not proceed in any of these appeals until the appropriate time after the consolidation motion has been decided. [20-3124, 20-3501, 20-3594, 21-1038, 21-1039, 21-1106, 21-1107, 21-1109, 21-1175]--[Edited 02/09/2021 by ARR] [Notice was re-sent after order was docketed in all nine cases.] (CLW) [Entered: 02/09/2021 04:10 PM] |
Filing 17 ECF FILER: UNOPPOSED Motion filed by Appellees Cincinnati Casualty Co, Cincinnati Indemnity Co, Cincinnati Insurance Co and Cincinnati Insurance Companies for Extension of Time to file TO RESPOND TO APPELLANTS MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE APPEALS until/for FEBRUARY 22, 2021. Certificate of Service dated 02/04/2021. Service made by ECF, Email. [20-3594] (LMS) [Entered: 02/04/2021 02:53 PM] |
Filing 16 ECF FILER: AMENDED CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant 4431 Inc. [20-3594] (CMP) [Entered: 02/03/2021 12:18 PM] |
Filing 15 ECF FILER: JOINT Motion filed by Appellant 4431 Inc to Consolidate Appeal Nos. 20-3124, 20-3594, 21-1038, 21-1039, 21-1106, 21-1107 & 21-1109. Certificate of Service dated 01/29/2021. Service made by ECF, Email. [20-3594]--[Edited 01/29/2021 by CJG] (CMP) [Entered: 01/29/2021 03:57 PM] |
Filing 14 Attorney Bar status modified for Lawrence M. Silverman, Esq. for Cincinnati Insurance Co, Cincinnati Casualty Co, Cincinnati Insurance Companies and Cincinnati Indemnity Co. Status is now active. (TMK) [Entered: 01/08/2021 09:16 AM] |
Filing 13 Notice to Counsel. The attached document is restricted. To view document, click on the document number link in the NDA (Notice of Docket Activity). In order to access this document, you must be the attorney of record using your individual ECF login and password. (SY) [Entered: 01/06/2021 01:05 PM] |
Filing 12 NOTICE REGARDING ATTORNEY STATUS for APPEARANCE FORM filed by Attorney Lawrence M. Silverman, Esq. for Appellees Cincinnati Insurance Co, Cincinnati Casualty Co, Cincinnati Insurance Companies and Cincinnati Indemnity Co. Counsel's current status in this Court's attorney rolls is inactive. An attorney must have active status in order to appear before this Court. R.A.D.E. 17.3. If you wish to return to active status or if you believe that you have been marked inactive in error, please complete the Attorney Admission Renewal/Adjustment of Status Form available on this Court's website by 01/19/2021. Future filings will not be accepted from an attorney in inactive status. (TMK) [Entered: 01/05/2021 04:17 PM] |
Filing 11 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellees Cincinnati Casualty Co, Cincinnati Indemnity Co, Cincinnati Insurance Co and Cincinnati Insurance Companies. [20-3594] (LMS) [Entered: 01/04/2021 12:51 PM] |
Filing 10 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from LAWRENCE SILVERMAN on behalf of Appellee(s) Cincinnati Insurance Companies; The Cincinnati Insurance Company; The Cincinnati Casualty Company and The Cincinnati Indemnity Company. [20-3594] (LMS) [Entered: 01/04/2021 12:36 PM] |
Filing 9 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Robert A. Freedberg, Esquire on behalf of Appellant(s) 4431 Inc.. [20-3594] (RAF) [Entered: 01/04/2021 09:07 AM] |
Filing 8 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant 4431 Inc advising this court that no transcripts are available. [20-3594] (CMP) [Entered: 01/04/2021 09:04 AM] |
Filing 7 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant 4431 Inc. [20-3594] (CMP) [Entered: 01/04/2021 09:02 AM] |
Filing 6 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant 4431 Inc. [20-3594] (CMP) [Entered: 01/04/2021 09:00 AM] |
Filing 5 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant 4431 Inc. [20-3594] (CMP) [Entered: 01/04/2021 08:57 AM] |
Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Christian M. Perrucci, Esquire on behalf of Appellant(s) 4431, Inc.. [20-3594] (CMP) [Entered: 01/04/2021 08:50 AM] |
Filing 3 ORDER (Clerk) For all parties represented by any attorney from Florio, Perrucci Steinhardt & Fader LLC, the designated filer shall be 4431, Inc. (CJG) [Entered: 12/23/2020 11:02 AM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 12/23/2020 11:01 AM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant 4431 Inc in District Court No. 5-20-cv-04396. (CJG) [Entered: 12/23/2020 10:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.