Pedro Dominguez v. Administrator Northern St, et al
| PEDRO DOMINGUEZ |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and ADMINISTRATOR NORTHERN STATE PRISON |
| 21-1382 |
| March 1, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellees Administrator Northern State Prison and Attorney General New Jersey to motion. Certificate of Service dated 03/18/2021. [21-1382] (MLB) [Entered: 03/18/2021 08:44 AM] |
| Filing 5 Notice received from district court that ifp has been granted to Appellant Pedro Dominguez. (SB) [Entered: 03/17/2021 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Pedro Dominguez for Certificate of Appealability. Response due on 03/25/2021. Certificate of Service dated 03/10/2021. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 03/17/2021 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (MW) [Entered: 03/03/2021 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 3 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Meredith L. Balo on behalf of Appellee(s) Administrator Northern State Prison; Attorney General of New Jersey. [21-1382] (MLB) [Entered: 03/02/2021 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (AMR) [Entered: 03/01/2021 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Pedro Dominguez in District Court No. 2-19-cv-08970.--[Edited 03/02/2021 to attach correct documents] (AMR) [Entered: 03/01/2021 04:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
