Omar Richardson v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
| OMAR RICHARDSON |
| SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA |
| 21-1646 |
| April 2, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Omar Richardson. (JK) [Entered: 05/06/2021 01:49 PM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellant Omar Richardson to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 05/10/2021. Certificate of Service dated 04/28/2021. Service made by ECF. (JK) [Entered: 04/28/2021 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 Exhibits filed by Appellant Omar Richardson to be atached to the COA Application. (JK) [Entered: 04/26/2021 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION filed by Appellant Omar Richardson for Certificate of Appealability. Response due on 05/06/2021. Certificate of Service dated 04/26/2021. Service made by ECF. (JK) [Entered: 04/26/2021 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Benjamin J. Halle on behalf of Appellee(s) Supt. Huntingdon SCI; District Attorney Philadelphia; Attorney General Pennsylvania. [21-1646] (BH) [Entered: 04/07/2021 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 3 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (NF) [Entered: 04/06/2021 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 04/02/2021 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Omar Richardson in District Court No. 2-19-cv-02959. (CJG) [Entered: 04/02/2021 03:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
