Toshisada Onishi, et alIn re: Toshisada Onishi, et al
| In re: TOSHISADA ONISHI, TERUKO ONISHI and D.A.O. |
| DAVID C. CHAPLEAU, MICHAELENE M. MACHOWIAK, ELAINE B. BROWN, ARIENNE MEIRING, COUNTY OF ST. JOSEPH, JAMES S. KIRSCH, CALE J. BRADFORD, RACHEL ELLEN HOUSE, LORETTA H. RUSH, NANCY ANN HOUSE and JULIEN X. NEALS |
| CURTIS THEOPHILUS HILL, JR. |
| 21-2490 |
| August 10, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ECF FILER: THE AUGUST 11, 2021 LETTER TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT CONCERNING THE ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETING FEE filed by Petitioners D.A.O., Mr. Toshisada Onishi and Teruko Onishi. Certificate of Service dated 08/11/2021. Service made by ECF. [21-2490] (TO) [Entered: 08/11/2021 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 11 ECF FILER: THE AUGUST 11, 2021 LETTER TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT CONCERNING THE ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETING FEE filed by Petitioners D.A.O., Mr. Toshisada Onishi and Teruko Onishi. Certificate of Service dated 08/11/2021. Service made by ECF. [21-2490] (TO) [Entered: 08/11/2021 10:39 AM] |
Filing 10
ORDER (Clerk) No action will be taken on Petitioners Notice of Payment for the Filing Fee for Certified Unopposed Petition for Writ of Mandamus Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3771(d)(3) Crime Victims Rights Act and Petitioners Amended Notice of Payment for the Filing Fee for Certified Unopposed Petition for Writ of Mandamus Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3771(d)(3) Crime Victims Rights Act . The petitioners are advised that a petition for writ of mandamus is an original action, and a separate docketing fee must be paid to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. A check in the amount of $500 should be made payable to Clerk, U.S. Courts of Appeals. The docketing fee may also be paid by credit card through Pay.gov by active members of the Third Circuit Bar or pro se litigants who are registered for electronic filing through PACER. Visit pay.gov or access the Court's website for instructions. If the petitioners seek a refund of the docketing fee previously paid to the district court, they must address that issue to the district court. (SB) [Entered: 08/11/2021 08:41 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER (Clerk) Action on the above-captioned petition for writ of mandamus is hereby deferred. The petitioners did not pay the required $500 filing fee or submit a complete motion to proceed in forma pauperis on behalf of each petitioner. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis submitted by Toshisada Onishi is not sufficiently complete for the Court to rule on at this time because it does not include an affidavit of poverty in the form prescribed by the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 24.1. If the petitioners want to proceed in forma pauperis they must each submit a complete motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 14 days of this order. If the filing fee is not paid or complete motions are not filed, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 107.1. Until the petition is brought into compliance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 21, the petition is deemed lodged with the Court and will not be submitted to the Court for a decision. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(3). In accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 21(b)(1) and Local Appellate Rule 21.1(b), responses to the petition are not required unless requested by the Court. (SB) [Entered: 08/11/2021 08:35 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Notice of Payment For The Filing Fee for Certified Unopposed Petition For Writ of Mandamus Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3771(d)(3) Crime Victims' Rights Act. Certificate of Service dated 08/10/2021. Service made by Email. (SB) [Entered: 08/11/2021 08:31 AM] |
| ECF FILER: Original Proceeding filing fee paid Petitioner Toshisada Onishi. Fee Amount: $500.00 Receipt Number: A03-61591-105. [21-2490] (TO) [Entered: 08/11/2021 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 7 ECF FILER: AMENDED NOTICE OF PAYMENT FOR THE FILING FEE FOR CERTIFIED UNOPPOSED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS filed by Petitioners D.A.O., Mr. Toshisada Onishi and Teruko Onishi. Certificate of Service dated 08/10/2021. Service made by ECF. [21-2490] (TO) [Entered: 08/10/2021 11:59 PM] |
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: NOTICE OF PRO SE PETITIONERS INTENT TO FILE CERTIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3771(d)(3), CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT filed by Petitioners D.A.O., Mr. Toshisada Onishi and Teruko Onishi. Certificate of Service dated 08/10/2021. Service made by ECF. [21-2490] (TO) [Entered: 08/10/2021 09:03 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: NOTICE CONCERNING CERTIFIED UNOPPOSED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3771(d)(3), CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT filed by Petitioners D.A.O., Teruko Onishi and Mr. Toshisada Onishi. Certificate of Service dated 08/10/2021. Service made by ECF. [21-2490] (TO) [Entered: 08/10/2021 08:56 PM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH L.A.R. 21.1(a) filed by Petitioners Mr. Toshisada Onishi, Teruko Onishi and D.A.O.. Certificate of Service dated 08/10/2021. Service made by ECF. [21-2490] (TO) [Entered: 08/10/2021 08:53 PM] |
| Filing 3 ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC JOINT APPENDIX on behalf of Petitioner Mr. Toshisada Onishi. Certificate of service dated 08/10/2021 by ECF, Email. [21-2490] (TO) [Entered: 08/10/2021 08:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioners D.A.O., Teruko Onishi and Mr. Toshisada Onishi to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 08/23/2021. Certificate of Service dated 08/09/2021. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 08/10/2021 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioners D.A.O., Teruko Onishi and Mr. Toshisada Onishi. (SB) [Entered: 08/10/2021 04:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
