Michael Walker, et al v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
MICHAEL WALKER and MAURICE PEARSON |
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of Corrections |
21-2756 |
September 22, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Michael Walker v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Walker Summary Action. Response, if any, due on 11/15/2021. Certificate of Service dated 11/02/2021. Service made by US mail. (CJG) [Entered: 11/09/2021 12:02 PM] |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 10 MOTION filed by Appellants Maurice Pearson and Mr. Michael Walker for Appointment of Counsel. (CJG) [Entered: 10/06/2021 09:50 AM] |
Filing 9 PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Mr. Michael Walker. (CJG) [Entered: 10/06/2021 09:48 AM] |
Filing 8 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Mr. Michael Walker. (CJG) [Entered: 10/06/2021 09:47 AM] |
Filing 7 IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Mr. Michael Walker. (CJG) [Entered: 10/06/2021 09:47 AM] |
Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Walker to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (CJG) [Entered: 10/06/2021 09:46 AM] |
Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Tara J. Wikhian on behalf of Appellee(s) Wetzel, Kauffman, Kohler, Walters, Spyker, Price, Scalia, Powell, Houp, House, Loy, Ralston, Yost. [21-2756] (TJW) [Entered: 09/29/2021 02:38 PM] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.